Arthur Shawcross killed and cannibalized parts of eleven prostitutes in the Rochester area, but he recalls sparing the life of one:
That one where he talks a bunch of jibberish following it? I don’t know. He tends to do things like that when being interviewed, and too right. Why do they care? They won’t even look for the truth and just blame him.
Why would he have a logical conversation to those that do not listen.
Hi~! Just have to say that you are one of my favourite blogs and LOVE reading up on the things you post. Keep up the good work!
THANK YOU!!! :)
THANK FUCK. He was just about to leak information on how I killed 2Pac.
While stationed in Alaska during an army stint in 1949, the sociopathic Harvey Carignan was sentenced to hang for rape-murder, but escaped the gallows because of a legal technicality. Paroled after just nine more years, he embarked on a string of burglaries and assaults and soon landed back behind bars where he remained until 1969. Four years later, while managing a gas station in Seattle, he murdered a teenage job applicant who had answered his “Help Wanted” classified - a crime that would earn him the nickname, the “Want-Ad Killer.” Shortly afterward - with detectives making things hot for him in Seattle - he decamped for Minneapolis, where, over the next two years, he perpetrated a series of shockingly brutal crimes, sexually assaulting his victims before bludgeoning their skulls with a hammer. Despite the savagery of these attacks, several women survived to identify Carignan, who was taken into custody by the Minneapolis police. Inside his car, investigators discovered road maps marked with dozens of incriminating red-penciled circles that corresponded to the sites of various crimes linked to the “Want-Ad Killer.” Under questioning, Carignan tried paving the way for an insanity defence by claiming that he had killed under direct orders from God (whom he described somewhat vaguely as a mysterious figure “who had a large hood on and you can’t see his face”) The jury at his 1975 trial was unconvinced, and Carignan received life imprisonment.
No. I haven’t heard about this. What’s her name and I’ll look it up?
Just the same things that everybody else knows - that it was pretty much a dumbing ground for the mentally disabled, where they lived in DREADFUL conditions.
Here’s a clip which shows some of the abhorrent conditions in which these patients lived.
There were also urban myths of those children living in the abandoned school following it’s closure, and a sort of “boogey monster” called Cropsey, that kidnapped and killed children around there too. The body of a missing girl was found on the grounds and Andre Rand, a former patient in the school was charged, although there is much speculation as to whether it was him who committed the murder.
Hey, just wanted to add that Andre Rand was actually a physiotherapist or custodian at the school. I don’t know if he was ever diagnosed with any kind of mental deficiency himself, but the film implies that working there and seeing those kids in that state left some damage. A few of Staten Island’s missing children, who have been linked to him, had various mental and physical disabilities. He stayed with a Reverend whilst he was being investigated for the murder of Jennifer Schwieger, and the Reverend claimed that Andre confessed that he killed children who he felt weren’t wanted or loved by their parents because they were better off dead - which could be a reaction to the conditions in Willowbrook. Obviously, this kind of case attracts a whole bunch of lies and rumours and the actual evidence is really shady…
Thank you for the correction and extra information :)
Thought so. Thanks!
Here’s the irony:
Complaining about people indulging in arguments on tumblr, while indulging in an argument, completely voluntarily, that doesn’t involve them.
The reason that she’s supporting and agreeing with him, at the expense of revealing her own double standard (or it could be argued outright hypocrisy), is clearly for the sole fact that she has found someone who is willing to attack Emily, even though it’s for fabricated reasons and outright delusional beliefs.
WAS THAT NOT A HOAX?!
I can’t imagine that being true. One of the reasons they got rid of the guillotine and other certain methods is because of how graphic and gruesome the death was.
Just because you have a disagreement with somebody doesn’t mean that you aren’t going to find anything else that you have in common, or things within your personalities that click.
We both apologised to each other and have been talking ever since, and we get on really well. So that’s why I am reblogging her!
Above is school shooter Pekka-Eric Auvinen, who killed 8 people at a high school in southern Finland. He attempted to commit suicide instantly by shooting himself in the head, but failed. He died in a hospital hours later from the gunshot wound to the head. The shooting occurred on November 7th, 2007. Auvinen was named afterward the Youtube Killer, because he had uploaded videos to the site, one of which displaying him shooting his gun.
That’s the internet for you - people feel safe enough to say whatever the want to people without any repercussions. Things they wouldn’t dream of saying in person because they would get told that they are being a twat.
I assume it’s because last year she was mocking Serra’s appearance, and posting her address and I reblogged it and said that she was being pathetic. I don’t see anything wrong with sticking up for my friend. And I once pointed out that something she posted was incorrect.
I don’t see how any of that could have held such significance to her that she would feel the need to seek out somebody that was sending threats to me and join in with their parade of hate, but sure, it’s nice to know somebody is that invested in me!